Hillary Clinton has contradicted herself yet again. In a recent interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, Hillary confirmed that she is inconsistent beyond belief on her positions concerning abortion.
The most illogical statement that Hillary makes in this interview is when asked when or if the unborn child has constitutional rights, in which she responded: “The unborn person” has no constitutional rights. To this answer, the logical question is: How could anyone be a “person” but have no rights?
In the Roe v. Wade decision, the writers admit: “If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.” How can Hillary Clinton say in the same breath that the unborn is a person but has no legal rights? It defines common sense, the law, and human decency.
Hillary Clinton is a smart woman, and she knows intuitively that unborn babies are people (what else could they possibly be?). In order to justify abortion on demand, because she’s gotten tens of thousands of dollars from Planned Parenthood and other abortion political Action Committees for her campaign, she has to rationalize her position on abortion, regardless of the holes in her arguments.
Hillary Clinton’s inconsistencies are innumerable, but this one is certainly notable. Pro-life voters need to call out Hillary Clinton on her utter disregard for the unborn and for her desire to build a campaign and presidency around false narratives. The unborn are people and they deserve constitutional rights.
About The Contributor
